I cannot admit that like most red-blooded Americans when I received my Jury Summons I was displeased. I cannot decide if this is because I have a few family members and friends in the Legal System (professionally and by choice), or that I had spent a good deal of time in my late teens and early 20's playing chicken with the judicial system (I guess you could say professionally, but most definitely
not by choice). For the record, I won most of these challenges, but the few times they won, they crushed me.
Of course, I was not initially pleased with my Jury Summons date. Originally, the Los Angeles County Courts wanted me to report, or rather remain "On Cal" the week of December 21. Oh, LA County and their need to be included in the Christmas festivities by inviting me to call them up every day for 5 days and see if I could join them for a day of fun in the Marble halls and Assembly rooms. Sorry, I had already made plans to return to Denver for the week, and spend it with my newly doubled-in-size family. Unfortunately, LA County Courts do not care if you have family or vacations already planned and payed for. They are your Number One priority upon receiving that envelope. Fortunately, they will allow you to postpone and reschedule your date with destiny.
For some odd reason, I had figured that there was never anything of importance or relevance come mid March, so the week of the 15th would be a
great week to try again.
Now, no matter what you think of the judicial system, for those of us that are not currently or actively pursuing a long term relationship with the balances of Justice, you apparently can never sync up and be on the same page, ever. I only say this after being stuck in a room for several hours with disgruntled people so bitter, they were actually trying to schedule Parent Teacher conferences, Root Canals and Lady Gaga concerts for a more enjoyable experience once they were done with their civic duty. I only had to postpone, or keep a handful of producers and agents on call, leaving several of my shoots planned that week to be "if available".
While I was looking forward to the possibility that I could play a pivotal role in the determination of some of my community peers dilemmas, I was looking forward the possibility that I was going to get passed on actually having to report to the court house as the week had progressed and I kept hearing those awkwardly robotic produced words, "You do not have to report for Jury Duty on -[insert day of the week]- Please call back on -[same day of the week mentioned I didn't have to report]- to see if you have to report for duty."
Sunday told me no Monday duty. Monday told me no Tuesday duty. Tuesday told me no Thursday duty. Wait, what happened to Wednesday? I had been approached to shoot on Weds, and I left it up to the "if available" due to Jury Duty. If I never had it, then I could have worked. Also, I was to be on call for 5 days. Was that just 5 days, or was that the business week of the 15th? Was Monday now a possibility, cause I already booked work. Was Wednesday omitted because of St. Patrick's Day? Or was this another budget cut from the state of California? I tried to call and find the answer to all these questions, only to find out that the other budget cut, to try and make up some of the state of California's budget, was that the system was all automated, and unless you knew the magic password combination from Labyrinth and held the Golden Key, you couldn't find out anything, and there would never be a live person to talk to. Or at least that was what I had found trying to decipher the phone.
Thursday however, did not play as nicely as the rest of the week. In my hopes and with the light at the end of the tunnel so close, as I was leaving a shoot I did on Thursday I called in to see about my responsibilities for Friday. I found that, "You have been selected to report for Jury Duty on -Friday- at the LA County Court House at..." and then I stopped paying attention. My free friday, just became my day in the Halls of Justice. Only there would be no Superman in this one. Boo.
My other surprise to all of this, was when I went to call back again and confirm what time I was to be showing up at the court house. I had figured that I would be required to be there at 9am. You know, government building; "9-5" normal people business hours; they typical "day-job" routine. I did not expect to hear that at 9am I would already have been in the building for an hour and a half. 730am Call Time?! (yes, I used that lingo, give me a break, it is what it is. I was going to eventually be on stand right?) I get up at 730, I don't make coherent words until 9am. I most certainly don't understand multi-syllabic conversation before 9am, and you want me to play with the Law before then? Oh California, you have a great sense of humor.
I do have to admit, watching the sunrise was a beautiful experience, and one that I usually only reserve to the best of "dates", camping, and for some awesome reason, Vegas. So, my sunrise on Friday March 19 was nothing less than a classy experience. Even though it was from the 101 Freeway during rush hour traffic.
I brought all the materials anyone should when reporting to a respectable setting, with the most professional of people, methodically keeping peace, order and our democracy what it was designed to be by our forefathers: my iPod, drawing materials, my iPhone and a phone charger (unfortunately the building predated the necessity for an outlet to be placed every 3 feet for people to keep their electronics happily useful and as a distraction from all that is around us.
My fellow summoned and I sat through our light-hearted announcement of our responsibilities and duties which we were to fulfill, with the ever explicit information that we were now the Court's Bitch, and would and could be so for up to 7 business days from that point forward. I forget how this math all worked out, it was pre-multi-syllabic hours of operation.
The first batch of 50 summoned were called to report upstairs to a department room. I drew and listened for my name. I listened to the people around me discuss how many times they'd been summoned, where their kids were (hoping for school), what kind of trials they may be selected for, how
not to attempt to be removed from the selected, and surprisingly how we were all looking forward to our day together.
At 10 my name was called in the second batch of summoned residents to fulfill our obligations at that point in the day to Department 37. Dutifully, I put away my colored pencils and notebook, coiled up my earphones and filed out towards the escalators to report for duty. I won't lie, felt a bit like Middle School. Love it.
My fellow summoned and I were filed into a small court room (I'm sure one they'd really use for a divorce hearing, not the gargantuan arena you see in the movies), to see the judge sitting on her post, as was the clerk, but the liaison and the 4 attorneys were all standing awaiting our arrival like the concierge of a fine hotel. We were sworn to answer any and all questions asked of us honestly and fairly. We were then told the basis of the trial for which they were going to be selecting 12 of us for. It had to do with a Lemon Law Suit. (I'm sure I'm not violating anything by admitting that much). She then asked if we knew any of the parties involved. The judge had also informed us that this particular case was expected to last 6 business days, starting the following Monday. Suddenly my enthusiasm to do my civic duty seemed like a curse.
Here's my deal: I have a few issues. Obviously some people have already picked up on this. I'm sure this is slightly apparent when you read my stories and have seen my interviews. For the short list: I have Kyphoscoliosis, A.D.D. and I'm Dyslexic. While my scoliosis is not very apparent, it does cause me back pain at times, and I cannot sit still for very long, ever; movies are about my max allowed timeframe, though I'll be very fidgety during all of that. I have great control over my ADD and my Dyslexia, and neither is really an issue, but I am like a cat, and I do get distracted very easily, and I can't really comprehend a lot unless I simply participate. When the judge asked about hardships, I had told her that as long as it was ok for me to stand and pace around every now and then, I was fine. Surprisingly, she said that they could probably do that for me. Score.
After a short recess, we all returned for the courts to call the 1st 14 members of the jury (for the unfamiliar 12 regular, 2 alternate jurors). This is when the real circus started. Every juror had to state their name, occupation, marital status, children and status, and previous jury experience. Then the judge had inquired about any and all legal background that any of the jurors may have. This included family and friends working in and around the legal system as attorneys, clerks, secretaries and the such. She also asked if there was any reason that they'd be biased towards the plaintiff or defendant for the case at hand. Pretty simple; make sure everyone was at least of some sort of sound mind. Several were not, at least to my expectations, and she dismissed none.
Then, the court was introduced to the presenting plaintiff attorney. His opening line (in that ever so TERRIFIED wavering/stuttering voice), "Good morning everyone, thank you ff..ff..fff..for beee.eee.being 'ere this morning. Az you cc..c..can see you're nottt the only onez here for the 1st ti ti ttime."
Poor guy, late 20's, pretty good looking was terrified out of his gord. In his defense, they were taking on a large corporation, we'll just leave it as one of the car manufacturers, with this Lemon Law suit, and it was one of his first cases before a judge I'm assuming. He went on to ask if everyone had a car; if they'd ever had any experience with a car breaking down; if they had any experience working on cars; pretty much he went on to ask 20 questions about anything having to do with customer service, the automotive industry and how everyone felt about the judicial system as a whole. Before he was, what I felt to be, halfway through interviewing the potential jury we were recessed for lunch.
I'll side note lunch. Downtown LA is gorgeous. I went to the bank, and I walked around a few blocks. It was warm out, so I removed my shirt for 2 reasons: 1- so that when I went back into the court room, with no windows, piled on top of several people, I wouldn't be the stinky sweaty guy. 2- It was a warm, beautiful day out, I wanted to get some sun! While meandering around the Disney Concert Hall, I had been asked by an Officer to please put my shirt back on, for I was in public. Yes, you cannot not wear a shirt in downtown Los Angeles. For the record, this is because it apparently scares the elderly.
When we returned to the court room, the trembling attorney had restarted his inquiry. Though this time, even he had mentioned that he think his nerves had settled. I could only have hoped for him that meant he took a couple shots of Jose to get this party going. He really only took about another 20 minutes asking the jury on the stand his questions. Not too bad. Though, in my book, the questions he was asking wasn't so much to qualify the competency of the jury selected, but really almost to call them for witnesses for his case. Just saying.
The defendant attorney had taken the stand to interview (cross examine really as well) the jury. She too seemed to be around my age, and the plaintiff's attorney, and she was very much so pregnant. I know I shouldn't assume that she was pregnant, but in the dress that she was wearing, and with her legs built the way they were, she was either Pregnant, hiding the basketball for the attorney's recess, or had a wicked tumor going on. She did have a bit more commanding authority (she didn't stutter or seem like she was going to wet herself) but she had the most monotone voice, and was beyond one of the most boring people I'd ever heard. 20 minutes of her interviewing was enough to have the judge call for another recess. Poor thing.
During this recess my peer were starting to get antsy. My friends and colleagues were trying to get me to stand up and just start yelling random biased slurs so that I'd get kicked out and would be free. It was then that I announced that this wasn't just a matter of not getting selected, it was a matter of not getting selected by 5p. I get kicked out of that court room, I go back to the assembly room and await another trial to call for jurors. But, if I'm not selected for this jury as close to 5 as possible, and there aren't any other trials looking for jurors that day, I'd be home free for the year. I was riding the clock.
When we filed back in, the attorneys dismissed 1/2 the jury for their own reasoning. I was a bit surprised to hear some of the dismissals. Seemed like the perfect juror for that attorney. 6 more people selected (I white knuckled getting called; it was still too early) and they began the interview process again. One poor woman would respond to everything, grasping at whatever she could to be dismissed from that jury. No dice. It almost seemed like there was a vendetta against the jury at that point. If anyone had stated that they didn't care for one thing or another, they stayed. Yet, those that said they'd be open, fair and just to all parties were sent back to the assembly room. Odd.
For the next three rounds of calls and dismissals, 2-3 people would be called, and dismissed after the interview. I'll admit, I started getting the feeling that the attorneys were stacking the jury with people that they knew,
secretly. Sometimes I like to play paranoid conspiracy theorist too.
We had taken a couple more recesses to allow the judge to convene with the attorneys without us all sitting there. I was starting to get nervous. I think that, while I hadn't been instantly dismissed due to my concerns earlier, I was moved to the last potential juror called for that grouping of people. During the recesses I'd watch my fellow summoned pace around the hall, wondering if this was their time. It was like watching the condemned. I had to keep telling myself that
we weren't the ones being called to stand, we were just the ones to select who the winner would be. And that didn't even have to be unanimous.
During one of the recesses, the plaintiff client and his wife had showed up to witness the selection process. As did some other people on the defending side. I can only assume them to be from the firm.
In one of the most comical (to me) called to the jury summoned, was a man from Silverlake. He had a catering business, and was single (read with disdain and a tone that said "I'm gay, and not allowed to marry in this state, so I'm recognized as single) and that he knew no one in the legal system. By the time this gentleman had taken "his" seat in the box (juror number 4) the whole drill was known. The judge nor the attorneys bothered asking the questions verbatim, and just let the juror tell his story. Mr. Silverlake had announced that he had purchased a Kia from Glendale Ford (none of the three of those factors mattered at all in the case) and that he had been given a bad key to the car (another useless fact). Then, when the judge asked if he'd be able to deal with a Lemon Law case objectively if he could look beyond that Kia situation that had no relation to this case, he stated he could. Then Mr. Silverlake had stated that he'd totaled that Kia, and had totally lost the car, because the insurance wouldn't cover that loss and or damage. Again, the judge asked if he could look beyond that Insurance claim, to objectively look at the Lemon Law case before him unbiased. He said he could. Had I not been running the clock, and hoping that we could keep that going for another half hour at least, I'd have slapped Mr Silverlake myself for his blatant disassociation to the questions. In an even more entertaining statement that he then went on to say, he despised lawyers because of how his insurance settlement had gone. Valid point, but still left field. Great slap in the face to Mrs. No-personality-preggers. He was dismissed, which actually surprised me at that point. We broke for another recess. Score.
Upon arrival back from that recess, there were 9 of us left to select from. In a matter of 10 minutes, we had been reduced to 5. It was like catch and release from a bucket. Called, recites name, occupation, biased, released by one of the attorneys. Another juror would try to intervene and cause commotion, only to be ignored like the "friend" no one likes. The judge seemed to be getting more and more displeased with the process going on before her. Also, by pure coincidence, the jurors they were selecting were the 5 next to me, right down the line. If I was in seat 6, they had chronologically taken seat 1, 2, 3, 4 then 5.
Now the kid in seat 5, he was something else. He gets called to stand, barely mumbles his name and that he's an "actor and artist" (read, holier than thou). Then he blatantly says that he could care less about the entire case, because he feels it's a waste of time. I shit you not, 15 seconds later, the jury is being sworn in. Kid says "I could care less about this case and feel that this is a gigantic waste of time. I don't care about it at all." Judge says, "Plaintiff, would you like to dismiss anyone?" Plaintiff states. "Pass." Judge asks the same of the defendant. Defendant says, "Pass". Judge asks the jury to stand, and swears them in. Done.
Now, mind you, I know that we are not in the home run just yet. The judge has not dismissed anyone yet, all she has done is swear in the jury, whom all looked like they'd just been sent to prison for the next 32 years. The 6 of us sitting in que all are tying to stifle smiles (it's now 3:51pm on a Friday, we're home free!) Also, the Kid is still standing, mouth agape, Man-Purse still slung over his shoulder, hands in his pockets. "Do I have to really agree to that? I said I don't care about this case. I don't want to chose a side, and could care less who wins this case. It's ridiculous. You're going to make me chose and do something I don't want to do?" As he slinging all of this, I'm still planning what I'm going to say when I get called up to his chair after they haul him off for contempt, which is exactly what the judge was threatening at that very moment. The judge pulls the attorneys to the side for a sidebar, off the record as the clerk announces that the microphone is not on at the time. Only, when they all return to their positions, she breaks for another quick recess of 8 minutes. Putting us back in the court room at 4pm.
The Kid is pacing like a pissed of child. The rest of us there are trying not to talk about what is going on, because we're not supposed to doing that. I start analyzing the selected jury at this point:
1-Jobless Mother, can't afford a babysitter, with a daughter that is mentally unstable and can't be home alone
2-Man so nervous that one of our breaks was so he could go get sick. Also, only understands 25% english
3-A guy that hasn't spoken at all since 10am, but has no legal ties, nor automotive ties, seems like a robot
4-The Kid, "actor and artist" who hates the courts
5-Girl that has admitted she has a learning disability
6-The A/V guy from the Zoo, who seems a bit off (he forgot that he was in law school for a year in '96)
7-Housewife (in her 60's+) of a retired lawyer, but couldn't name the type of law he practiced
8-Guy who no one understands, much less do we think he can understand us
9-12 I can't even remember, but they fit the same scary genre that was "we don't know what's going on, here much less anywhere" motif.
I felt like there was still hope for me if I was called. Even the Jobless Mother was claiming I was lucky I had missed out. I had reaffirmed her that we were all still standing in the hallway waiting, I wasn't out of the woods just yet.
That's when the weirdest thing happened. The liaison between the court and the jury came out and stated, "To everyone that reported to Department 37, thank you for your time and for serving, you are all dismissed. Please return to the Jury Assembly room to turn in your badges, you have completed you summons for the year." This did include the 12 selected and sworn in jury. We laughed. We jumped for joy. We joked around. Our somber selves all day long, had instantly turned to that of a happy group of people, out of school for the weekend, and free from any burden that we may have had. I honesty couldn't help but just laugh.
I have 2 assumptions as to what had happened in those 8 minutes.
1- The whole thing and day had been an exercise and practice for the attorneys to interview and select a jury. Their incompetency, or total perfect stacking of the jury had been either a perfect fail (hence why the judge was getting so upset towards the end of the process), or they had passed, and everyone was ready to move on to the weekend. I can't help but feel like this was really what was going on, and that this was a live practice run.
2- The 2 parties involved in the suit, had decided to settle it then and there, and not waste anyone's time. Just about anyone that had any sort of experience with a bad car, had all said that all was righted by time and diligence in returning to the dealership where they had taken the car in the first place. No on in the room was willing to grant the plaintiff any additional monies for the trouble of taking the Lemon suit to court, but they all felt that breaking even was fair. Like I had stated earlier, I kind felt like the Stuttering lawyer wasn't examining potential jurors, but interviewing "witnesses" for his case. With his client in the room, and the manufacturer being represented by the Pregnant-monotone, if it was a real case, I wouldn't be surprised if they just settled then and there, and went on Spring Break 2010 right then and there.
I still was a little disappointed that I didn't get to be interviewed. While I'd love to serve on a jury at some point in my life, I'd have loved to see the reaction on the court room's face when I stated, "My name is_______, I am a Porn Star and a Columnist for LA Weekly. I'm single, and I have no children. I've been summoned 5 times for Jury Duty, but never served. My mother and my step-sister-in-law are both paralegals, my mom's boyfriend is an attorney, for civic cases and estate claims. My friend is in law school in San Diego, though I'm not sure what branch he's focusing on, my bad. I have had a bad experience with a car, my first car was a lemon, and had I been able to track down the 'business' that sold me the car, I sure would have sued him under the Lemon Law too, but I couldn't find him, so therefore wasn't able to. I'd try my hardest to not side with the consumer in this case, but let's be honest, I didn't own a car for 7 years afterwords because I didn't trust anyone to buy a car from. Oh, and I live in the valley."
Sadly, I was robbed of that experience too, for now.